EphemerisXResearch

Complete Response Letters

medac Gesellschaft fur klinische Spezialpraparate mbH: Grafapex

What FDA's Complete Response Letters to the company say, in the letters' own words.

Complete Response Letter, Jul 30, 2021

1. You have not provided substantial evidence of effectiveness of treosulfan as a part of a preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult and pediatric patients with AML or MDS for the following reasons:
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 2Open the letter at p. 2 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p1:s17
Because all complete blood cell (CBC) and marrow results were not submitted, we were unable to independently confirm the results of the analysis of the primary endpoint of EFS for Study MC-FLudT-14/L Trial Il.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 2Open the letter at p. 2 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p1:s19
Whether the results would be adequate to support approval of both indications will be a review issue.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 2Open the letter at p. 2 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p1:s23
To address this issue, submit data from an adequate and well-controlled trial of treosulfan vs busulfan with a prespecified analysis of OS for each indication with control of Type 1 error.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p1:s33
We reserve comment on the proposed carton and container until the application is otherwise adequate.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p1:s45
In order to obtain approval for both indications, you would need to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness for each individually.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s33
2. Your subgroup analyses of EFS and OS suggest a substantial difference in treatment effect by donor type.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s34
Clarify how the results support your claim of noninferiority of treosulfan for HSCT from both related and unrelated donors (with the latter using ATG).
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s35
3. You conducted your efficacy analyses in the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s36
Fora randomized trial with EFS and/or OS endpoints, the analyses should be conducted on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s37
Include subgroup analyses by race and ethnicity for overall survival, nonrelapse mortality and relapse-free survival with at least 3 years of follow-up.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s41
6. Address the following in the NDA resubmission:
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p2:s44
7. We recommend that prior to the resubmission of the NDA, you conduct an in vitro study demonstrating DNA alkylation and breakage with treosulfan to adequately characterize the alkylating and genotoxicity properties and determine the potential serious risk of reproductive and developmental toxicity and carcinogenicity with treosulfan.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 6Open the letter at p. 6 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p3:s13
This study should be submitted to the NDA with the resubmission.
Complete Response Letter · Jul 30, 2021 · p. 6Open the letter at p. 6 ↗CRL_NDA214759_20210730:p3:s14

More Complete Response Letters

All companies in the CRL Tracker →

Updated Sep 30, 2026 · built from 283 companies in the EphemerisX knowledge graph. This page is regenerated as companies are added.