EphemerisXResearch

Complete Response Letters

Saol International Development Limited: sodium dichloroacetate

What FDA's Complete Response Letters to the company say, in the letters' own words.

Complete Response Letter, Aug 27, 2025

The data presented in NDA 218679 failed to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness for sodium dichloroacetate (DCA) for the treatment of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency (PDCD).
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 1Open the letter at p. 1 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p1:s19
You proposed to establish substantial evidence of effectiveness using two adequate and well-controlled trials: SL1009-01 and SL1009-02.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 1Open the letter at p. 1 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p1:s21
The proposed post hoc analyses for the subgroup of subjects with Period 1 baseline ObsRO motor score = 8 were deemed inappropriate to determine the presence of a DCA treatment effect.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 1Open the letter at p. 1 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p1:s23
DCA with a nominal two-sided p-value < 0.05. However, the changes in the baseline plasma lactate were minimal and additional clinical and nonclinical data provided did not support the observed reduction in plasma lactate as a surrogate endpoint that predicts clinical benefit in PDCD.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 2Open the letter at p. 2 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p1:s27
To address this deficiency, submit the results of at least one new adequate and wellcontrolled trial demonstrating the effect of DCA on clinically meaningful endpoint(s) in the intended population.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p2:s7
If you intend to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness based on a single adequate and well controlled trial, you will also need to provide adequate confirmatory evidence substantiating the results of your adequate and well controlled trial.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p2:s8
As substantial evidence of effectiveness of DCA for the treatment of PDCD was not established in this application, we cannot conclude that the known and potential risks with DCA in your application are outweighed by its benefit(s).
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p2:s10
Therefore, for the potential benefits and risks to be adequately evaluated, the following issues, including those for premarketing risk assessment, and our recommendations for resolving those issues, must be addressed, in some manner, in the resubmission of your application.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p2:s11
2. You have not conducted a thorough QT/QTc study to evaluate the effect of DCA on QT interval prolongation and the currently available clinical safety database in the NDA is insufficient to assess the potential effect of DCA on the QT interval.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 3Open the letter at p. 3 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p2:s15
If you do not have a conditionally acceptable proprietary name, you may submit a Request for Proprietary Name Review to your IND.
Complete Response Letter · Aug 27, 2025 · p. 5Open the letter at p. 5 ↗CRL_NDA218679_20250827:p2:s40

More Complete Response Letters

All companies in the CRL Tracker →

Updated Sep 30, 2026 · built from 283 companies in the EphemerisX knowledge graph. This page is regenerated as companies are added.