EphemerisXResearch

FDA approval record

Soliqua 100/33 (insulin glargine; lixisenatide): BLA 208673

What FDA's own reviews of this application say about the decision, the evidence, safety and what was required after approval, in the documents' own words.

The decision

Twelve members of the committee recommended approval of the product and two members did not recommend approval based on expected risks associated with introducing a two pen presentation in the healthcare setting.
Summary Review · p. 6Open the document at p. 6 ↗SumR:p6:s10
At the end of the meeting the Advisors were asked if they recommended approval of the fixed combination drug product delivered using the proposed pen devices for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
Summary Review · p. 28Open the document at p. 28 ↗SumR:p28:s13

The evidence of effectiveness

In fact, I know of no data that suggest more rapid (measured in months) attainment of ADA glucose goal offers a clinical benefit.
Summary Review · p. 29Open the document at p. 29 ↗SumR:p29:s14
In a clinical pharmacology study in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, lixisenatide reduced fasting plasma glucose and postprandial blood glucose AUC0-300min compared to placebo (-33.8 mg/dL and -387 mg·h/dL, respectively) following a standardized test meal.
Label at approval · p. 19Open the document at p. 19 ↗208673s000lbl:p19:s1
The mean difference (95% CI) in HbA1c reduction between SOLIQUA 100/33 and insulin glargine was -0.5 [-0.6, -0.4] and statistically significant.
Label at approval · p. 23Open the document at p. 23 ↗208673s000lbl:p23:s11
At Week 30, SOLIQUA 100/33 provided statistically significant improvement in HbA1c (p value <0.0001) compared to insulin glargine 100 units/mL and lixisenatide-treated patients (-1.6%, -1.3%, and -0.9%).
Label (S-007) · p. 23Open the document at p. 23 ↗208673s007lbl:p23:s8

Safety

In fact, some GLP-1 receptor agonists can be injected once weekly, have a similar short term (6 months) glucose lowering effect than Soliqua, are simpler to dose and have less risks of hypoglycemia or weight gain.
Summary Review · p. 6Open the document at p. 6 ↗SumR:p6:s15
Overall the safety analyses revealed that Soliqua carries common risks attributable to both glargine (hypoglycemia) and lixisenatide components (GI-related adverse reaction, allergic adverse reactions, injection site reactions and immunogenicity related risks).
Summary Review · p. 26Open the document at p. 26 ↗SumR:p26:s16
No risks identified require risk management beyond labeling to warrant consideration of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS).
Summary Review · p. 31Open the document at p. 31 ↗SumR:p31:s10
We acknowledge receipt of your submission dated December 21, 2015, of a proposed risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS).
Approval letter · p. 5Open the document at p. 5 ↗ltr:p5:s18
We have determined that, at this time, a REMS is not necessary for Soliqua 100/33 to ensure that its benefits outweigh its risks.
Approval letter · p. 5Open the document at p. 5 ↗ltr:p5:s19
This Prior Approval supplemental new drug application proposes revisions to the prescribing information, Section 6, Adverse Reactions, Hypoglycemia, providing only the severe hypoglycemia events.
Approval letter (S-002) · p. 1Open the document at p. 1 ↗ltr_o1s002:p1:s15

What FDA required after approval

Postmarketing requirement pursuant to the Pediatric Research and Equity Act are discussed in the CDTL memorandum and primary review.
Summary Review · p. 31Open the document at p. 31 ↗SumR:p31:s9

Related drugs

All drugs →

Updated Sep 30, 2026 · built from 20 FDA applications in the EphemerisX knowledge graph. This page is regenerated as FDA applications are added.