EphemerisXResearch

FDA approval record

Ozempic (semaglutide): NDA 209637

What FDA's own reviews of this application say about the decision, the evidence, safety and what was required after approval, in the documents' own words.

The evidence of effectiveness

Overall, Dr. He concludes that the applicant has provided substantial evidence that both doses of semaglutide are effective in improving glycemic control.
Summary Review · p. 26Open the document at p. 26 ↗SumR:p26:s30
The maintenance treatment period was 6 months for the following efficacy trials: 3623 monootherapy vs placebo), 3625 (vs insulin glargine on a background of OADs), and 3627 (vs placebo on a background of basal insulin+metformin).
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 36Open the document at p. 36 ↗MedR:p36:s15
Placebo-controlled trials (trials 3623, 3627 and 3744) were doubleblinded.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 37Open the document at p. 37 ↗MedR:p37:s8
Superiority of semaglutide 1 mg versus placebo in change in body weight at week 104.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 157Open the document at p. 157 ↗MedR:p157:s19
The difference between semaglutide and placebo in time to first EAC-confirmed MACE among all randomized patients was analysed using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model with treatment group (semaglutide, placebo) as fixed factor.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 183Open the document at p. 183 ↗MedR:p183:s8
The phase 3 trials were designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in a broad population of patients with T2DM covering the continuum of T2DM care, and included five multinational trials (trials 3623, 3624, 3625, 3626, 3627), two Japanese trials (trials 4091, 4092), and a cardiovascular outcome trial (trial 3744) referred to as the CVOT.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 221Open the document at p. 221 ↗MedR:p221:s27

Safety

In summary, I believe that semaglutide has a favorable benefit-risk profile.
Summary Review · p. 5Open the document at p. 5 ↗SumR:p5:s20
While the nonclinical signal for MTC and the findings for pancreatitis in the semaglutide development program are similar to that of other long-acting GLP-1 RAs, REMS assessment data for other long-acting GLP-1 RA products indicate that the risk for these two concerns has been acceptably communicated to the relevant prescriber groups.
Summary Review · p. 37Open the document at p. 37 ↗SumR:p37:s7
Given the REMS assessment data from other GLP-1 RA products, the DRISK and DMEP review teams believe that the risks of MTC and pancreatitis can be adequately communicated with appropriate labeling and, thus, do not recommend a REMS for semaglutide.
Summary Review · p. 37Open the document at p. 37 ↗SumR:p37:s8
Overall, the semaglutide safety profile was generally consistent with the known safety profile for GLP-1 RAs, with gastrointestinal adverse events being the most common adverse events, and potential for hypoglycemia on a background of insulin and/or insulin secretagogues.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 24Open the document at p. 24 ↗MedR:p24:s21
Semaglutide by itself does not appear to increase the risk for hypoglycemia, but it is expected to lead to an increased risk for hypoglycemia when used in combination with sulfonylurea or insulin.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 27Open the document at p. 27 ↗MedR:p27:s17
So far, for the currently marketed GLP-1 RAs, the benefit-risk profile has not changed significantly in the post-marketing setting.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 218Open the document at p. 218 ↗MedR:p218:s27

What FDA required after approval

This includes 16 phase I clinical pharmacology trials, 1 phase 2 dose finding trial and 8 phase 3A therapeutic confirmatory trials.
Other Reviews · p. 116Open the document at p. 116 ↗OtherR:p116:s12

Related drugs

All drugs →

Updated Sep 30, 2026 · built from 20 FDA applications in the EphemerisX knowledge graph. This page is regenerated as FDA applications are added.