EphemerisXResearch

FDA approval record

Ozempic (semaglutide): NDA 213051

What FDA's own reviews of this application say about the decision, the evidence, safety and what was required after approval, in the documents' own words.

The decision

Based on the data reviewed, Dr. Elena Braithwaite recommends approval.
Summary Review · p. 10Open the document at p. 10 ↗SumR:p10:s10
Overall, the data support that the intended maintenance doses of semaglutide (7 mg and 14 mg) were effective in reducing HbA1c, and Dr. Abugov, the statistical reviewer, recommends approval.
Summary Review · p. 21Open the document at p. 21 ↗SumR:p21:s12

The evidence of effectiveness

While the reduction in HbA1c compared to placebo was somewhat less for oral semaglutide as compared to sq semaglutide based on historical data, oral semaglutide demonstrated substantial evidence of effectiveness for glycemic control from adequate and well controlled trials, and the oral formulation offers a therapeutic alternative from injectable therapies.
Summary Review · p. 3Open the document at p. 3 ↗SumR:p3:s13
PIONEER 6 was conducted to evaluate cardiovascular safety, and efficacy data for this trial will be discussed in the review for NDA 213182. See Table 2 for a list of the key efficacy trials.
Summary Review · p. 14Open the document at p. 14 ↗SumR:p14:s6
In PIONEER 6, there was a lower incidence of SAEs reported with semaglutide versus placebo (18.9% vs. 22.5%, respectively).
Summary Review · p. 22Open the document at p. 22 ↗SumR:p22:s21
There were a total of 137 first MACE events which occurred during the trial, with 61 subjects (3.8%) in the semaglutide group versus 76 subjects (4.8%) in the placebo group.
Summary Review · p. 25Open the document at p. 25 ↗SumR:p25:s12
In the placebo pool, there were 3.8% subjects in the semaglutide arm, vs. 2.9% subjects in the placebo group, and in PIONEER 6, there were 7.1% subjects in the semaglutide arm, vs. 6.3% subjects in the placebo group.
Summary Review · p. 26Open the document at p. 26 ↗SumR:p26:s14
The phase 3 program included a trial in patients with moderate renal impairment, PIONEER 5. An event-driven pre-market cardiovascular outcomes trial (PIONEER 6) compared semaglutide vs placebo on a background ranging from monotherapy to OADs, basal or pre-mixed insulin.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 32Open the document at p. 32 ↗MedR:p32:s5

Safety

In summary, the clinical development program demonstrated semaglutide has a favorable benefit-risk profile.
Summary Review · p. 4Open the document at p. 4 ↗SumR:p4:s8
Conduct a medullary thyroid carcinoma registry-based case series of at least 15 years duration to systematically monitor the annual incidence of medullary thyroid carcinoma in the United States and to identify any increase related to the introduction of Rybelsus (semaglutide) tablets into the marketplace.
Approval Letter · p. 6Open the document at p. 6 ↗Approv:p6:s18
Semaglutide by itself does not appear to increase the risk for hypoglycemia, but it is expected to lead to an increased risk for hypoglycemia when used in combination with sulfonylurea or insulin.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 23Open the document at p. 23 ↗MedR:p23:s12
So far, for the currently marketed GLP-1 RAs, the benefit-risk profile has not changed significantly in the post-marketing setting.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 147Open the document at p. 147 ↗MedR:p147:s22
No REMS was deemed to be necessary for semaglutide.
Clinical (Medical) Review · p. 274Open the document at p. 274 ↗MedR:p274:s39
• Prior serious hypersensitivity reaction to semaglutide or any of the excipients in RYBELSUS (4).
Label (S-020) · p. 1Open the document at p. 1 ↗213051Orig1s020_213051Orig1s021lbl:p1:s22

What FDA required after approval

In addition, a post-marketing requirement (PMR) for a milk-only lactation study to assess concentration of semaglutide and SNAC in breast milk is recommended.
Summary Review · p. 3Open the document at p. 3 ↗SumR:p3:s23
This trial was conducted to address the following postmarketing requirement (PMR) established in the September 20, 2019, Approval letter.
Approval letter (S-020) · p. 1Open the document at p. 1 ↗213051Orig1s020_213051Orig1s021ltr:p1:s18
Since there are concerns based on animal studies, that the drug may accumulate in human milk, DPMH recommends a PMR for the applicant to conduct a milk only lactation study.
Other Reviews · p. 11Open the document at p. 11 ↗OtherR:p11:s11

Related drugs

All drugs →

Updated Sep 30, 2026 · built from 20 FDA applications in the EphemerisX knowledge graph. This page is regenerated as FDA applications are added.