EphemerisX Atlas · FDA & SEC record

The complete response letter atlas

Every published FDA complete response letter, as data you can shape. Build a cohort, compare groups, rearrange the charts, and open the letters, passages and SEC filings behind any mark.

456 letters · 336 applications · 283 sponsors
Dataset 2026-10-09.1 · outcomes as of 2026-10-09
Method · Download the data

Studies

Your views

What is in the atlas

Every complete response letter the FDA has published through openFDA (2002–2026), each matched to its application, its sponsor and the sponsor's SEC filings. A complete response letter is the FDA's decision not to approve an application in its current form. Each letter is tagged with the deficiency categories it cites and linked to the public PDF; approvals come from Drugs@FDA.

Letters by year

YearLettersPublication
201312published once approved
20148published once approved
20159published once approved
201620published once approved
201725published once approved
201833published once approved
201937published once approved
202036published once approved
202147published once approved
202225published once approved
202330published once approved
202469published as issued
202559published as issued
202632published as issued

Before 2024 the FDA published a letter only once the product was later approved; from 2024 it publishes letters as issued. The two periods are not comparable as rates, and the workspace keeps them apart wherever an outcome is computed.

Letters published as issued (2024+)

What the 160 letters cite

CategoryLettersShare
Facility inspection9258%
Product quality (CMC)6842%
Efficacy evidence3522%
Safety149%
Clinical pharmacology2012%
Device / human factors85%
Nonclinical2314%
Accelerated approval85%

Where the 125 original applications stand

Status as of 2026-10-09ApplicationsShare
Approved3326%
Resubmitted (public source)97%
No public outcome7560%
Discontinued (public source)11%
CBER biologic, not in Drugs@FDA76%

Facility citations across consecutive letters

When a letter cited a facility inspection and the application was rejected again, the next letter cited a facility in 56 of 71 pairs (79%), against 19 of 47 (40%) when the earlier letter did not. All eras, consecutive letters of the same application.

Method

  • Letter. A complete response letter (CRL) in the SEC Ephemeris corpus: every letter openFDA publishes, matched to its sponsor.
  • Application. An NDA or BLA number. Letters naming the same number belong to one application; cycle is a letter's order within it.
  • Letter type. Original application or supplement: the two coders' call for 2024+ letters, else the openFDA file's supplement number, else 'supplement' when Drugs@FDA shows the application approved before the letter.
  • Era. issued: the application's first letter is dated 2024 or later, when the FDA began publishing letters as issued. after_approval: earlier, when a letter was published only once the product was approved.
  • Categories. Taxonomy v1 (FAC, CMC, EFF, SAF, CLP, DEV, NCL, AAP, REG). Two-coder coding for 2024+ letters; section-aware rules over the knowledge graph for the rest (agreement in rule_agreement).
  • Outcome. approved: Drugs@FDA lists an original approval of the same application after its first letter. resubmitted / discontinued: a public source says so (2024+ only). not_covered: a CBER biologic (BLA 125xxx) with no Drugs@FDA record. no_public_outcome: none of these, which is not a rejection. supplement: the application's letters are all on supplements.
  • Time to approval. Days from the first original-application letter to approval; applications not approved are censored at outcomes_as_of. Kaplan-Meier with log(-log) Greenwood 95% intervals.
  • Pair. Two consecutive letters of the same application on different dates.

How far the rule-read categories can be trusted

For letters dated before 2024, categories are read by rules over the EphemerisX knowledge graph. Each build measures those rules against the two-coder coding of the 2024+ letters:

CategoryCoded lettersRecallPrecision
Facility inspection930.961.0
Product quality (CMC)680.930.8
Efficacy evidence350.690.92
Safety140.570.73
Clinical pharmacology200.750.88
Device / human factors81.00.67
Nonclinical230.570.68
Accelerated approval81.00.67

Filter by category source to keep only coded letters. Your filters, comparisons and layout change the view; they never change these definitions, the outcome rules or how missing outcomes are treated. Every export carries the dataset version and the exact view.

Sources

openFDA complete response letters · Drugs@FDA · SEC EDGAR. The atlas stores only public URLs, sentence locators and short quotes, never the documents.

Built from public FDA letters, Drugs@FDA and SEC filings. Not investment, legal or regulatory advice. Deep research · Ask the FDA and SEC Ephemeris →