Aldeyra Therapeutics · reproxalap · Nov 2023 – Apr 2025

Did the FDA's 2025 letter ask Aldeyra for the same study as its 2023 letter?

The request for “at least one additional adequate and well controlled study” appears in the 2023 letter, as Aldeyra quotes it, and in the same words on page 2 of the 2025 letter.

EphemerisX Research · Published · 6 source documents · 1 min read

Short answer

Yes, in the same words, one hyphen aside. Aldeyra quotes the 2023 letter asking for at least one additional adequate and well-controlled study to show a positive effect on the ocular symptoms of dry eye. The chamber trial it ran next was, it said, designed to satisfy that request. The 2025 letter, issued on the resubmission that included that trial, contains the same sentence.

What the evidence shows

The 2023 letter is not in this record; Aldeyra's 10-K quotes it: the FDA said that at least one additional adequate and well-controlled study to demonstrate a positive effect on the treatment of ocular symptoms of dry eye 10-K · Feb 27, 2026 should be conducted. The company's April 2025 press release summarises it as stating that at least one additional symptom trial was required 8-K · Apr 3, 2025.

The August 2024 chamber trial, the company said, was designed to satisfy the FDA’s New Drug Application (NDA) resubmission requirement 8-K · Aug 8, 2024, quoting the same words. The October 2024 resubmission included previously disclosed positive results from a recently completed dry eye disease symptom trial requested by the FDA following review of the previously submitted NDA 8-K · Oct 3, 2024.

Page 2 of the FDA's April 2, 2025 letter: You should conduct at least one additional adequate and well controlled study to demonstrate a positive effect on the treatment of ocular symptoms of dry eye FDA · Apr 2, 2025 · p. 2. The paragraphs just above it say the Study 030 analysis is problematic FDA · Apr 2, 2025 · p. 2, and when Study 030 is analyzed the way Study 024 was, the study does not achieve statistical significance FDA · Apr 2, 2025 · p. 2. What did the FDA find wrong with Study 030?

In September 2026 Aldeyra summarised the sequence: Aldeyra has received three Complete Response Letters, the first two of which recommended an additional clinical trial 8-K · Sep 29, 2026. This record holds the second and third of those letters; the first is known here only through the company's quotations of it.

Follow the thread

This investigation connects to

The documents, by date

Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed August 8, 20248-K · Aug 8, 2024Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed October 3, 20248-K · Oct 3, 2024FDA Complete Response Letter, April 2, 2025FDA letter · Apr 2, 2025Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed April 3, 20258-K · Apr 3, 2025Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 10-K, filed February 27, 202610-K · Feb 27, 2026Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed September 29, 20268-K · Sep 29, 2026

The passages quoted

Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed August 8, 2024

The dry eye chamber clinical trial was designed to satisfy the FDA’s New Drug Application (NDA) resubmission requirement, identified in the previously received complete response letter, of “at least one additional adequate and well-controlled study to demonstrate a positive effect on the treatment of ocular symptoms of dry eye.” Through the FDA Special Protocol Assessment process and additional comments, the FDA provided feedback on the clinical trial protocol and statistical plan.
Open at the source →

Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed October 3, 2024

The resubmission includes previously disclosed positive results from a recently completed dry eye disease symptom trial requested by the FDA following review of the previously submitted NDA, as well as a draft label reflecting acute activity in reducing dry eye symptoms in a dry eye chamber trial, chronic activity in reducing dry eye symptoms in a field trial, and acute activity in reducing ocular redness in two dry eye chamber trials.
Open at the source →

FDA Complete Response Letter, April 2, 2025 · page 2

Study 030 was similar in design to Study 024 from the original submission. When Study 030 is analyzed in a similar method to Study 024 from the initial submission (Visit 4 DEC score at each timepoint as the dependent variable), the study does not achieve statistical significance.
Open at the source →

FDA Complete Response Letter, April 2, 2025 · page 2

You used Visit 2 and Visit 4 DEC results as the dependent variable and performed linear contrasts to obtain treatment differences between Visit 4 and Visit 2 results. The Agency finds the Study 030 primary efficacy endpoint analysis problematic, and we do not find the study results to be robust.
Open at the source →

FDA Complete Response Letter, April 2, 2025 · page 2

You should conduct at least one additional adequate and well controlled study to demonstrate a positive effect on the treatment of ocular symptoms of dry eye. In the conduct of this study, you should not make changes to the protocol or the statistical analysis plan after the first subject is enrolled in the study without expressed agreement by the FDA.
Open at the source →

Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed April 3, 2025

In November 2023, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter to the initial NDA stating that at least one additional symptom trial was required. Following discussions with the FDA, and as part of a comprehensive strategy designed to account for disease heterogeneity and potential differences in clinical sites and environment, Aldeyra initiated three clinical trials assessing dry eye disease symptoms: a dry eye chamber trial, a clinical trial in a different dry eye chamber, and a six-week field trial.
Open at the source →

Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2026

On November 27, 2023, Aldeyra announced that the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL) regarding the NDA submission. Although no safety or manufacturing issues with reproxalap were identified, the FDA stated in the letter that the NDA did not demonstrate “efficacy in treating ocular symptoms associated with dry eyes” and that “at least one additional adequate and well-controlled study to demonstrate a positive effect on the treatment of ocular symptoms of dry eye” should be conducted.
Open at the source →

Aldeyra Therapeutics Form 8-K, filed September 29, 2026

Following an NDA submission and two NDA resubmissions of reproxalap for the treatment of dry eye disease, Aldeyra has received three Complete Response Letters, the first two of which recommended an additional clinical trial to “demonstrate a positive effect on the treatment of ocular symptoms of dry eye” and the most recent of which did not request further clinical trials but stated that the “totality of evidence from the completed clinical trials does not support the effectiveness of the product.” Over the course of the three NDA submissions, Aldeyra has provided data from nine adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, five of which achieved all multiplicity-controlled primary endpoints, consistent with or greater than the success rates of clinical trials conducted for approved dry eye disease products.
Open at the source →

Prepared from public FDA letters and SEC filings: every quoted passage is matched to the original document, and every “not in” statement comes from a search of the whole document, before it is published. Questions, summaries and connecting sentences are EphemerisX’s wording. Not investment advice. How this research works → · Ask the FDA and SEC Ephemeris →